Design requires performance guarantee?

Design is a highly creative process that involves creating solutions for various problems. Whether it is designing a website, a building, or a product, the ultimate goal is to create something that is functional, aesthetically pleasing, and meets the needs of the end users.

However, the question arises: Does design need performance guarantee? Should designers be held accountable for the success or failure of their designs? This is a topic that has been debated among professionals in the design industry.

Proponents of performance guarantee argue that design should be treated as a service, just like any other profession. They believe that designers should be held responsible for the outcome of their work, and should provide some form of guarantee to ensure that their designs meet the desired objectives.

On the other hand, opponents argue that design is a subjective field, and it is difficult to measure its success or failure objectively. They believe that design is more about personal preferences and interpretations, and therefore, there should not be any performance guarantee.

One argument in favor of performance guarantee is that it can help build trust between designers and clients. When clients invest their time and money in a design project, they expect results. They want to be assured that the designer will deliver what was promised, and a performance guarantee can provide that assurance.

Moreover, a performance guarantee can also push designers to strive for excellence. Knowing that their work will be evaluated and judged based on certain criteria can be a motivating factor for designers to put their best foot forward. It can encourage them to go the extra mile and ensure that their designs are not only visually appealing, but also functional and effective.

However, opponents of performance guarantee argue that design is a highly subjective field, and success cannot be measured by predefined criteria. They believe that design is more about individual preferences, and what may work for one person may not work for another.

Additionally, they argue that a performance guarantee can stifle creativity and innovation. Designers should have the freedom to experiment, take risks, and think outside the box. If they are bound by a performance guarantee, they may be hesitant to explore new ideas and push the boundaries of design.

In conclusion, the question of whether design needs performance guarantee is a complex one. While it can help build trust and ensure accountability, it can also limit creativity and innovation. Ultimately, the decision to provide a performance guarantee should be based on the specific circumstances of each design project and the desires and expectations of the clients involved.